From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Youngs

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
May 22, 2013
301 P.3d 976 (Or. Ct. App. 2013)

Opinion

C120585CR; A151218.

2013-05-22

STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Steven Mark YOUNGS, Defendant–Appellant.

Washington County Circuit Court. Rick Knapp, Judge. Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Lindsey Burrows, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Justice J. Rillera, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.


Washington County Circuit Court.
Rick Knapp, Judge.


Peter Gartlan, Chief Defender, and Lindsey Burrows, Deputy Public Defender, Office of Public Defense Services, filed the brief for appellant. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Anna M. Joyce, Solicitor General, and Justice J. Rillera, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.
Before ARMSTRONG, Presiding Judge, and NAKAMOTO, Judge, and EGAN, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted, based on a guilty plea, of unlawful possession of methamphetamine. ORS 475.894. The trial court sentenced defendant to 18 months' formal probation and, as a condition of probation, ordered the forfeiture of defendant's cell phone, which was seized during the investigation of the crime. On appeal, defendant contends—and the state concedes—that the court lacked authority to order forfeiture as a condition of probation. We agree and accept the state's concession. SeeORS 161.045(4) ( “No conviction of a person for an offense works a forfeiture of the property of the person, except in cases where a forfeiture is expressly provided by law.”); State v. Olson, 246 Or.App. 785, 786, 268 P.3d 679 (2011), rev. den.,352 Or. 265, 286 P.3d 1230 (2012) (finding no statute authorizing forfeiture as a condition of probation). Accordingly, we remand for resentencing and otherwise affirm.

Remanded for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Youngs

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
May 22, 2013
301 P.3d 976 (Or. Ct. App. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Youngs

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Oregon, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Steven Mark YOUNGS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: May 22, 2013

Citations

301 P.3d 976 (Or. Ct. App. 2013)
256 Or. App. 755