From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Young

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 2005
359 N.C. 326 (N.C. 2005)

Summary

holding that the trial court impermissibly sentenced defendant on the basis of his refusal to enter a guilty plea on the basis of its comments that, "'if you pled straight up I'd sentence you at the bottom of the mitigated range,'" but that "'if you go to trial and [are] convicted,'" the defendant "would definitely get a sentence in the presumptive range'"

Summary of this case from State v. Pinkerton

Opinion

No. 577P04

3 March 2005


ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 9th day of November 2004 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 2005.


Summaries of

State v. Young

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Mar 1, 2005
359 N.C. 326 (N.C. 2005)

holding that the trial court impermissibly sentenced defendant on the basis of his refusal to enter a guilty plea on the basis of its comments that, "'if you pled straight up I'd sentence you at the bottom of the mitigated range,'" but that "'if you go to trial and [are] convicted,'" the defendant "would definitely get a sentence in the presumptive range'"

Summary of this case from State v. Pinkerton
Case details for

State v. Young

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. ANTOINE DENARD YOUNG

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Mar 1, 2005

Citations

359 N.C. 326 (N.C. 2005)
611 S.E.2d 851

Citing Cases

State v. Pinkerton

le error. State v. Haymond, ___ N.C. App. ___, ___, 691 S.E.2d 108, 123-24 (2010) (holding that the trial…