Opinion
(13778)
Argued February 21, 1995
Decision released April 4, 1995
Substitute information, in the first case, charging the defendant with the crimes of sexual assault in the third degree, unlawful restraint in the first degree and risk of injury to a child, and substitute information, in the second case, charging the defendant with three counts each of the crimes of sexual assault in the first degree and risk of injury to a child, and substitute information, in the third case, charging the defendant with two counts each of the crimes of sexual assault in the first degree and threatening and with the crime of risk of injury to a child, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of New London, where the cases were consolidated and tried to the jury before Parker, J.; verdicts and judgments of guilty, from which the defendant appealed to this court. Affirmed.
Bruce A. Sturman, public defender, for the appellant (defendant).
John P. Gravalec-Pannone, assistant state's attorney, with whom, on the brief, was C. Robert Satti, Sr., state's attorney, for the appellee (state).