From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wright

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 111 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 77270

June 26, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CHARLES COUNTY, HONORABLE NANCY L. SCHNEIDER.

Irene C. Karns, Asst. Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Lisa M. Sutherland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Robert G. Dowd, Jr., P.J., and Mary Rhodes Russell and Richard B. Teitelman, JJ.



ORDER


Appellant, Antonio McCown Wright, appeals his conviction for forgery in violation of Section 570.090, RSMo 2000. He contends the trial court plainly erred in permitting the prosecutor to ask improper questions during voir dire. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the trial court did not plainly err. An extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum opinion setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Wright

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 26, 2001
48 S.W.3d 111 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

State v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. ANTONIO McCOWN WRIGHT, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jun 26, 2001

Citations

48 S.W.3d 111 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)