From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wright

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 20, 2003
847 So. 2d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 2D02-1592.

June 20, 2003.


BY ORDER OF THE COURT:

Appellant's motion for certification of conflict is granted. The opinion dated April 16, 2003, is withdrawn, and the attached opinion is substituted therefor. The revised opinion certifies conflict with the Fourth and Fifth District Courts of Appeal, as in Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). No motions for rehearing will be entertained in this appeal. Appellant's motion to stay mandate pending review is also granted.

The State appeals Phillip Wright's sentence and argues that it is illegal because the trial court did not impose a three-year minimum mandatory sentence. We affirm Wright's sentence based on the authority of Green v. State, 839 So.2d 748 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). We certify conflict with the Fourth and Fifth Districts' cases with which we disagreed in Green. See id. at 755.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Wright

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jun 20, 2003
847 So. 2d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

State v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellant, v. PHILLIP WRIGHT, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jun 20, 2003

Citations

847 So. 2d 616 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)