From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wright

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 12, 2014
103 A.3d 165 (Conn. 2014)

Opinion

11-12-2014

STATE of Connecticut v. Billy Ray WRIGHT.

Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition. Lisa J. Steele, assigned counsel, in opposition.


Ronald G. Weller, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.

Lisa J. Steele, assigned counsel, in opposition.

Opinion

The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 152 Conn.App. 260, 96 A.3d 638, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the trial court had abused its discretion by precluding the defendant from asking certain questions during cross-examination about the police investigation in this case?

“2. If the answer to the first question is ‘yes,’ did these evidentiary improprieties deprive the defendant of his constitutional right to a fair trial?”


Summaries of

State v. Wright

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Nov 12, 2014
103 A.3d 165 (Conn. 2014)
Case details for

State v. Wright

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Billy Ray WRIGHT.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Nov 12, 2014

Citations

103 A.3d 165 (Conn. 2014)
314 Conn. 941

Citing Cases

State v. Wright

We thereafter granted the state's petition for certification to appeal to this court, limited to the…