From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. W.R.

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Oct 29, 2012
No. 67340-8-I (Wash. Ct. App. Oct. 29, 2012)

Opinion

67340-8-I

10-29-2012

STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. W.R., JR., D.O.B. 09/26/96, Appellant.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Per Curiam

W.R. appeals a juvenile court disposition finding him guilty of second degree rape by forcible compulsion. He contends the court erred in requiring him to prove that the charged act was consensual. He concedes this contention is at odds with State v. Camara, 113 Wn.2d 631, 781 P.2d 483 (1989), but argues that Camara rests on a flawed reading of United States Supreme Court precedent. Our Supreme Court rejected a similar challenge to Camara in State v. Gregory, 158 Wn.2d 759, 801-04, 147 P.3d 1201 (2006). Gregory and Camara control W.R.'s contention here.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. W.R.

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE
Oct 29, 2012
No. 67340-8-I (Wash. Ct. App. Oct. 29, 2012)
Case details for

State v. W.R.

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. W.R., JR., D.O.B. 09/26/96, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION ONE

Date published: Oct 29, 2012

Citations

No. 67340-8-I (Wash. Ct. App. Oct. 29, 2012)