From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. WORL

Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District
Jul 11, 1977
553 S.W.2d 719 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 10380.

June 22, 1977. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied July 11, 1977.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, HICKORY COUNTY, CHARLES V. BARKER, J.

John C. Danforth, Atty. Gen., Preston Dean, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for plaintiff-respondent.

Bruce W. Simon, Simon, Simon Katz, Kansas City, for defendant-appellant.


Defendant William Marvin Worl was convicted by a Hickory County jury of possession of a firearm while intoxicated [§ 564.610, RSMo 1969] and sentenced by the court to a three-year prison term.

Defendant's first appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. State v. Worl, 531 S.W.2d 294 (Mo.App. 1975). Defendant's postconviction motion under Rule 27.26 was sustained by the trial court on the ground defendant had timely sought an appeal but that his attorney failed to proceed properly. The sentence and judgment were vacated and defendant re-sentenced. This appeal followed.

We have reviewed the transcript and the briefs of the parties. The evidence in support of the jury's verdict is not insufficient. No error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b), V.A.M.R.

All concur.


Summaries of

STATE v. WORL

Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District
Jul 11, 1977
553 S.W.2d 719 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

STATE v. WORL

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. WILLIAM MARVIN WORL…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Springfield District

Date published: Jul 11, 1977

Citations

553 S.W.2d 719 (Mo. Ct. App. 1977)