From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Woolridge

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 25, 1990
102 Or. App. 559 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

89-03-95685; CA A60515

On respondent's motion for reconsideration filed May 18, 1990

Reconsideration allowed, former opinion modified and adhered to as modified July 25, 1990

Appeal from Circuit Court, Multnomah County.

Lee Johnson, Judge.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Keith W. Wingfield, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, for motion.

Before Graber, Presiding Judge pro tempore, and Riggs and Edmonds, Judges.


RIGGS, J.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.



We allow the state's motion for reconsideration of our opinion, 101 Or. App. 390, 790 P.2d 1192 (1990), to correct a misquotation from State v. Allmendinger, 36 Or. App. 381, 383, 584 P.2d 773 (1978) that appears at 101 Or. App. 395. What we intended to say is that mere threats of violence or verbal hostility may not be sufficient, standing alone, to show mental illness. We delete the sentence that followed the quotation in our former opinion.

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified.


Summaries of

State v. Woolridge

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 25, 1990
102 Or. App. 559 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

State v. Woolridge

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of John Woolridge, Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 25, 1990

Citations

102 Or. App. 559 (Or. Ct. App. 1990)
794 P.2d 1258

Citing Cases

State v. T. W. (In re T. W.)

See State v. Woolridge , 101 Or. App. 390, 395, 790 P.2d 1192, adh'd to as modified on recons. , 102 Or. App.…

State v. R.H

There is no evidence of any acts by appellant suggesting that he would follow through with his threats. Cf.…