From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Woolbright

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Apr 12, 2022
643 S.W.3d 153 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. ED 109789

04-12-2022

STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff, v. Dylan WOOLBRIGHT, Defendant.

John P. Quarenghi, 5205 Hampton, St. Louis, Mo. 63109, for plaintiff. Patrick G. Carmody, Brennan P. Conner, Co-Counsel, 120 S. Central Ave, Suite 1800, St. Louis, Mo. 63105, Samuel C. Freedlund, Co-Counsel, 4910 W. Pine Blvd, Apt 414, St. Louis, Mo. 63108, for respondent. Casey J. Rodgers, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1340, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for defendant.


John P. Quarenghi, 5205 Hampton, St. Louis, Mo. 63109, for plaintiff.

Patrick G. Carmody, Brennan P. Conner, Co-Counsel, 120 S. Central Ave, Suite 1800, St. Louis, Mo. 63105, Samuel C. Freedlund, Co-Counsel, 4910 W. Pine Blvd, Apt 414, St. Louis, Mo. 63108, for respondent.

Casey J. Rodgers, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1340, St. Louis, Mo. 63101, for defendant.

Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Angela T. Quigless, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM Appellant, Donald Woolbright, appeals pro se the order of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County denying his motion to refund cash bond to him after termination of the criminal case against his son, Defendant, Dylan Woolbright. Finding no error, we affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the trial court's judgment. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

State v. Woolbright

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Apr 12, 2022
643 S.W.3d 153 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

State v. Woolbright

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Plaintiff, v. Dylan WOOLBRIGHT, Defendant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Apr 12, 2022

Citations

643 S.W.3d 153 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)