Opinion
Court of Appeals No. S-14-021
09-18-2015
State of Ohio Appellee v. Shaquale R. Woodhouse Appellant
Thomas L. Stierwalt, Sandusky County Prosecuting Attorney, and Norman P. Solze, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Shaquale R. Woodhouse, pro se.
Trial Court No. 2003CR000200 DECISION AND JUDGMENT Thomas L. Stierwalt, Sandusky County Prosecuting Attorney, and Norman P. Solze, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Shaquale R. Woodhouse, pro se. OSOWIK, J.
{¶ 1} This is an accelerated appeal brought by appellant, Shaquale R. Woodhouse, pro se, from the judgment of the Sandusky County Court of Common Pleas which denied his motion for resentencing.
{¶ 2} Appellant appears to set forth two assignments of error that argue the trial court erred when, at the time of sentencing, it imposed court costs without advising him according to then-existing R.C. 2947.23(A)(1)(a) that he could perform community service should he fail to pay the costs.
{¶ 3} Since both arguments that appellant presents involve the application of R.C. 2947.23(A)(1)(a) to his case, we shall address them simultaneously.
{¶ 4} Appellant argues that the trial court imposed court costs without informing him of the community-service requirement in lieu of paying court costs. Appellant was sentenced in August of 2003, prior to the effective date of the current version of R.C. 2947.23(A)(1), which was amended by 2012 H.B. 247. Under the former version of R.C. 2947.23(A)(1) in effect when appellant was sentenced, if a trial court failed to notify a defendant of the possibility of court-ordered community service in lieu of paying costs, this court has held that, under such circumstances, the appropriate remedy for such failure is to reverse the trial court's sentence solely as it relates to the imposition of court costs, and to remand the cause for the limited purpose of allowing the trial court to give proper notification pursuant to R.C. 2947.23(A) with a concomitant opportunity for the defendant to object. State v. Griffin, 6th Dist. Lucas No. L-11-1283, 2013-Ohio-411, ¶ 51.
{¶ 5} Because appellant was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole, he will not be eligible to perform community service. Therefore, we cannot find that the trial court erred in failing to notify him of community service in lieu of paying court costs under former R.C. 2947.23(A)(1). See State v. Howard, 1st Dist. Hamilton No. C-130058, 2014-Ohio-655.
{¶ 6} We, therefore, find appellant's assignments of error not well-taken, and affirm the judgment of the trial court.
{¶ 7} The judgment of the Sandusky County Court of Common Pleas is affirmed. Appellant is ordered to pay the costs of this appeal pursuant to App.R. 24.
Judgment affirmed.
A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to App.R. 27. See also 6th Dist.Loc.App.R. 4.
Thomas J. Osowik, J.
Stephen A. Yarbrough, P.J.
James D. Jensen, J.
CONCUR.
/s/_________
JUDGE
/s/_________
JUDGE
/s/_________
JUDGE