Opinion
A181582
03-27-2024
STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SCHUYLER HOLDEN DONG WONG, Defendant-Appellant.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Matthew Blythe, Deputy Public Defender, Offce of Public Defense Services, fled the brief for appellant. Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.
This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).
Submitted February 13, 2024
Washington County Circuit Court 20CR10774; Ricardo J. Menchaca, Judge.
Ernest G. Lannet, Chief Defender, Criminal Appellate Section, and Matthew Blythe, Deputy Public Defender, Offce of Public Defense Services, fled the brief for appellant.
Jennifer S. Lloyd, Assistant Attorney General, waived appearance for respondent.
Before Lagesen, C. J., and Egan, J. LAGESEN, C. J.
LAGESEN, C. J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking probation and imposing a 24-month prison sentence. His appointed counsel filed a brief pursuant to ORAP 5.90 and State v. Balfour, 311 Or. 434, 814 P.2d 1069 (1991). The brief does not contain a Section B. See ORAP 5.90(1)(b). We affirm.
As authorized by ORS 2.570(2)(b), this matter is determined by a two-judge panel. See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or.App. 563, 484 P.3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v. Nooth, 254 Or.App. 402, 295 P.3d 115 (2012), rev den, 353 Or. 747 (2013) (same).
In November 2021, defendant pleaded guilty to three counts of felony fourth-degree assault constituting domestic violence, ORS 163.160(3). Defendant was sentenced to five years of probation. In April 2023, defendant admitted to probation violations. In May 2023, the trial court revoked probation and imposed a 24-month sentence on one of the counts and concurrent terms of six months and 13 months on the other two counts.
Having reviewed the record, including the trial court file and the transcript of the hearings, and the brief, and taking into account our statutorily circumscribed authority to review, see ORS 138.105(5), we have identified no arguably meritorious issues.
Affirmed.