From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Winters

Court of Appeals of Idaho
Aug 10, 2022
No. 49398 (Idaho Ct. App. Aug. 10, 2022)

Opinion

49398

08-10-2022

STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JONATHAN DAVID WINTERS, Defendant-Appellant.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth Ann Allred, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada County. Hon. Cynthia Yee Wallace, District Judge.

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years, for possession of a controlled substance, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Elizabeth Ann Allred, Deputy Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant.

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy Attorney General, Boise, for respondent.

Before LORELLO, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge; and BRAILSFORD, Judge

PER CURIAM.

Jonathan David Winters pled guilty to possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine, Idaho Code § 37-2732(c). The district court imposed a unified sentence of five years, with a minimum period of incarceration of two years, and retained jurisdiction. Winters filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district court denied. Winters appeals and asserts the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Both our standard of review and the factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant's entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Our role is limited to determining whether reasonable minds could reach the same conclusion as the district court. State v. Biggs, 168 Idaho 112, 116, 480 P.3d 150, 154 (Ct. App. 2020).

Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion. Therefore, Winters' judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.


Summaries of

State v. Winters

Court of Appeals of Idaho
Aug 10, 2022
No. 49398 (Idaho Ct. App. Aug. 10, 2022)
Case details for

State v. Winters

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF IDAHO, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. JONATHAN DAVID WINTERS…

Court:Court of Appeals of Idaho

Date published: Aug 10, 2022

Citations

No. 49398 (Idaho Ct. App. Aug. 10, 2022)