From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Winslow

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Aug 28, 2001
53 S.W.3d 251 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED78440

FILED: August 28, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS CITY, HONORABLE JOAN BURGER.

Jennifer S. Walsh, Assistant Public Defender, 1221 Locust, Suite 350 St. Louis, Missouri 63101, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Anne E. Edgington, Assistant Attorney General, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, for respondent.

Before Richard B. Teitelman, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., J. and Clifford H. Ahrens, J.



ORDER

Appellant, Robert Winslow, appeals from the judgment convicting him of two counts of first-degree robbery and two counts of armed criminal action. He contends the trial court plainly erred because it failed to sua sponte prohibit the State from trying all four charged offenses in the same trial. Having reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, we conclude the court did not commit error, plain or otherwise. Rule 30.20. An extended opinion would have serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Winslow

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three
Aug 28, 2001
53 S.W.3d 251 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

State v. Winslow

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. ROBERT WINSLOW, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three

Date published: Aug 28, 2001

Citations

53 S.W.3d 251 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Winslow v. State

Movant, Robert Winslow, appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief…