From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wilson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 19, 2001
53 S.W.3d 178 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED77855

Filed: June 19, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. LOUIS COUNTY HONORABLE STEVEN H. GOLDMAN.

Dave Hemingway, 1139 Olive, Suite 200, St. Louis, MO 63101, for appellant.

John Munson Morris III, Stephanie Morrell, P.O. Box 899 Jefferson City, MO 65102-0899, for respondent.

Before: Robert G. Dowd, P.J., Mary Rhodes Russell, J., and Richard B. Teitelman, J.



ORDER


Naketia Wilson appeals from a judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his pre-sentencing Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his pleas of guilty.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. The motion court's judgment is based on findings and conclusions that are not an abuse of discretion or in error. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties, however, have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Wilson

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Jun 19, 2001
53 S.W.3d 178 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

State v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent, v. NAKETIA WILSON, Appellant

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Jun 19, 2001

Citations

53 S.W.3d 178 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)