From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Williamson

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Feb 1, 2017
Appellate Case No. 2016-000236 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2017)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2016-000236 Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-062

02-01-2017

The State, Respondent, v. Kevin Williamson, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Aiken County
Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant. Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM : Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Williamson

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Feb 1, 2017
Appellate Case No. 2016-000236 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2017)
Case details for

State v. Williamson

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Kevin Williamson, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 1, 2017

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2016-000236 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 1, 2017)