From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Williams

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 17, 2019
278 So. 3d 966 (La. 2019)

Opinion

No. 2018-KH-1591

09-17-2019

STATE of Louisiana v. Ceasar James WILLIAMS aka Ceaser James Williams


ON SUPERVISORY WRITS TO THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF CALCASIEU

PER CURIAM:

Denied. Applicant fails to show that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel under the standard of Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

Applicant has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Applicant's claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, applicant has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.


Summaries of

State v. Williams

SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA
Sep 17, 2019
278 So. 3d 966 (La. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. CEASAR JAMES WILLIAMS AKA CEASER JAMES WILLIAMS

Court:SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

Date published: Sep 17, 2019

Citations

278 So. 3d 966 (La. 2019)