From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 11, 2013
310 Conn. 959 (Conn. 2013)

Opinion

2013-12-11

STATE of Connecticut v. Stanley WILLIAMS.

Lisa A. Vanderhoof, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Nancy L. Chupak, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.


Lisa A. Vanderhoof, assigned counsel, in support of the petition. Nancy L. Chupak, senior assistant state's attorney, in opposition.

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 146 Conn.App. 114, 75 A.3d 668, is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by precluding testimony from the defendant's expert on eyewitness identification?”


Summaries of

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 11, 2013
310 Conn. 959 (Conn. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Connecticut v. Stanley WILLIAMS.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Dec 11, 2013

Citations

310 Conn. 959 (Conn. 2013)
310 Conn. 959

Citing Cases

State v. Wright

This is in contrast to a sequential photographic array, in which the witness is shown the photographs one at…

State v. Williams

We granted the defendant's petition for certification to appeal, limited to the following issue: “Did the…