From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 2, 1977
379 A.2d 233 (N.J. 1977)

Opinion

Argued October 18, 1977 —

Decided November 2, 1977.

On certification to the Superior Court, Appellate Division, whose opinion is reported at 139 N.J. Super. 290 (1976).

Mr. Michael R. Klekman, Assistant Deputy Public Defender, argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Stanley C. Van Ness, Public Defender, attorney).

Mr. Philip B. Seaton, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for respondent ( Mr. Thomas B. Shusted, Camden County Prosecutor, attorney).

Mr. Robert E. Rochford, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for amicus curiae Attorney General of New Jersey ( Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).


The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division. For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER — 6.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

State v. Williams

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 2, 1977
379 A.2d 233 (N.J. 1977)
Case details for

State v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. ISAAC WILLIAMS…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 2, 1977

Citations

379 A.2d 233 (N.J. 1977)
379 A.2d 233

Citing Cases

State v. Williams

The State successfully appealed the modification order. State v. Williams, 139 N.J. Super. 290 (App.Div.…

State v. Williams

The State appealed this order, and this court reversed the order as a mistaken exercise of discretion. State…