From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Mar 10, 1998
963 S.W.2d 469 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

Nos. 68999 71921

Opinion Filed: March 10, 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court, City of St. Louis; John J. Riley, Judge.

Irene Karns, Judith Larose, Columbia, for appellant.

John Munson Morris, III, Catherine Chatman, Jefferson City, for respondent.

CRANE, P.J., and RHODES RUSSELL, J., and JAMES R. DOWD, J., concurring.



ORDER


Defendant, Dennis Williams, appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of first-degree robbery, in violation of Section 569.020, RSMo 1994, on which he was sentenced to twenty-five years imprisonment. Defendant also appeals from a judgment denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief.

As to the direct appeal, no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

As to the post-conviction appeal, the judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact and conclusions of law that are not clearly erroneous. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.


Summaries of

State v. Williams

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO
Mar 10, 1998
963 S.W.2d 469 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

State v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. DENNIS WILLIAMS, APPELLANT. DENNIS…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION TWO

Date published: Mar 10, 1998

Citations

963 S.W.2d 469 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998)