From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Williams

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Dec 1, 1968
164 S.E.2d 404 (N.C. Ct. App. 1968)

Opinion

No. 6821SC458

Filed 11 December 1968

APPEAL by defendant from Armstrong, J., at the 27 May 1968 Criminal Session of FORSYTH Superior Court.

Attorney General T. Wade Bruton and Deputy Attorney General Harry W. McGalliard for the State.

Hatfield, Allman Hall by Raymond D. Thomas for defendant appellant.


By indictment proper in form, defendant was charged with store-breaking and larceny. The jury found the defendant guilty as charged, and from sentence imposed thereon, defendant appealed.


Defendant's court-appointed counsel brings forward no assignment of error? frankly stating that he is unable to find prejudicial error but asks the court to carefully review the record and grant such relief as may be proper.

Accordingly, we have carefully reviewed the record before us and find that the defendant was given a fair trial, free from prejudicial error, and that the sentence imposed was within statutory limits. State v. Hopper, 271 N.C. 464, 156 S.E.2d 857; State v. Campbell, 2 N.C. App. 406, 163 S.E.2d 78. The judgment of the superior court is Affirmed.

BROCK and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Williams

North Carolina Court of Appeals
Dec 1, 1968
164 S.E.2d 404 (N.C. Ct. App. 1968)
Case details for

State v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. JAMES A. WILLIAMS

Court:North Carolina Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 1, 1968

Citations

164 S.E.2d 404 (N.C. Ct. App. 1968)
164 S.E.2d 404

Citing Cases

State v. Holden

This Court is constantly being called upon to review criminal cases where there is absolutely no merit in the…

State v. Flanders

We have carefully reviewed the record before us and find that the defendant was charged upon a valid bill of…