From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wilkes

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 11, 2013
366 N.C. 580 (N.C. 2013)

Opinion

No. 80A13.

2013-04-11

STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy Charles WILKES.

Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for Wilkes, Timothy Charles. Creecy C. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.


Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for Wilkes, Timothy Charles. Creecy C. Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
Maureen Krueger, District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.

ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition for discretionary review, filed by Defendant on the 19th of February 2013 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A–31 and the Appellate Rule 16(b) as to issues in addition to those presentedas the basis for the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the petition for discretionary review as to additional issues is

“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th of April 2013.”

Accordingly, only those issues which are the basis of the dissenting opinion in the Court of Appeals shall be presented to this Court in briefs. The Defendant's new brief so limited in scope shall be filed with this Court not more than 30 days from the date of certification of this order.


Summaries of

State v. Wilkes

Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Apr 11, 2013
366 N.C. 580 (N.C. 2013)
Case details for

State v. Wilkes

Case Details

Full title:STATE of North Carolina v. Timothy Charles WILKES.

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina.

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

366 N.C. 580 (N.C. 2013)
366 N.C. 580

Citing Cases

United States v. Smith

To the contrary, North Carolina courts have continued to require substantial evidence of defendants' specific…