From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wickizer

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 29, 2017
527 S.W.3d 126 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Opinion

WD 79627

08-29-2017

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Buddy James WICKIZER, Appellant.

Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent. Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.


Joshua D. Hawley, Attorney General, and Karen L. Kramer, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, Attorneys for Respondent.

Susan L. Hogan, Appellate Defender, Kansas City, MO, Attorney for Appellant.

Before Division Two: Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Presiding Judge, and Karen King Mitchell and Anthony Rex Gabbert, Judges

Order

Per Curiam:

Following a jury trial, Buddy Wickizer appeals the trial court's decision to admit certain testimony given by the victim's grandmother. Wickizer argues the testimony was inadmissible hearsay because Grandmother was not disclosed under § 491.075 as a witness who would testify about the victim's out-of-court statements and because Grandmother's testimony was not admissible under the hearsay exception recognized by § 491.075. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Wickizer

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 29, 2017
527 S.W.3d 126 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)
Case details for

State v. Wickizer

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Buddy James WICKIZER, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Aug 29, 2017

Citations

527 S.W.3d 126 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017)

Citing Cases

Wickizer v. State

Background Many of the underlying facts are taken directly from the memorandum issued in Wickizer's direct…