From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Whitehurst

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Mar 16, 1945
21 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 1945)

Opinion

March 16, 1945

A case of ogininal jurisdiction — mandamus.

Paul C. Albritton, Whitaker Brothers and Pat Whitaker, for relator.

J. Tom Watson, Attorney General, and John C. Wynn, Assistant Attorney General, and Clyde H. Wilson, State Attorney for respondent.


This cause is before us on motion to quash the alternative writ of mandamus heretofore issued.

On consideration of said motion, the Court, being advised of its opinion herein, finds the motion to quash insufficient and, therefore, same is denied.

Respondent is required to answer or make return to the alternative writ within ten days from the date of filing of this order; otherwise, the peremptory writ of mandamus will be issued as per the alternaive writ heretofore issued.

So ordered.

TERRELL, BROWN, BUFORD, THOMAS and SEBRING, JJ., concur.

CHAPMAN, C. J., disqualified.


Summaries of

State v. Whitehurst

Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc
Mar 16, 1945
21 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 1945)
Case details for

State v. Whitehurst

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, ex rel. FORREST CHAPMAN, v. GEORGE W. WHITEHURST, as…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida. En Banc

Date published: Mar 16, 1945

Citations

21 So. 2d 360 (Fla. 1945)
21 So. 2d 360