State v. White

6 Citing cases

  1. Hughey v. State

    No. A25A0027 (Ga. Ct. App. Aug. 9, 2024)

    When a trial court grants a criminal defendant's motion for new trial in part on grounds other than sufficiency of the evidence, the case is not final for purposes of filing a direct appeal. See Gonzales v. State, 315 Ga. 661, 663 (1) (a) (884 S.E.2d 339) (2023); see also State v. White, 354 Ga.App. 214, 215 (840 S.E.2d 697) (2020) ("Generally, an order is final and appealable when it leaves no issues remaining to be resolved, constitutes the court's final ruling on the merits of the action, and leaves the parties with no further recourse in the trial court.")

  2. Kinchen v. State

    No. A23A0502 (Ga. Ct. App. Nov. 21, 2022)

    Her failure to do so deprives us of jurisdiction over this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. See State v. White, 354 Ga.App. 214, 216 (840 S.E.2d 697) (2020).

  3. Thomas v. Thomas

    No. A23A0016 (Ga. Ct. App. Aug. 5, 2022)

    "Generally, an order is final and appealable when it leaves no issues remaining to be resolved, constitutes the court's final ruling on the merits of the action, and leaves the parties with no further recourse in the trial court." State v. White, 354 Ga.App. 214, 215 (840 S.E.2d 697) (2020) (punctuation omitted). See also OCGA § 5-6-34 (a).

  4. M.C. Tank Transp. v. Stephens

    No. A22A1049 (Ga. Ct. App. Apr. 7, 2022)

    OCGA 5-6-34 (a) (1). See also State v. White, 354 Ga.App. 214, 215 (840 S.E.2d 697) (2020) ("[g]enereally, an order is final and appealable when it leaves no issues remaining to be resolved, constitutes the court's final ruling on the merits of the action, and leaves the parties with no further recourse in the trial court") (citation and punctuation omitted). Here, the trial court's ruling on the discovery motions does not constitute a final order under OCGA 5-6-34 (a), as the case remains pending below.

  5. State ex rel. Burton v. Beckett

    No. A21A1166 (Ga. Ct. App. Aug. 11, 2021)

    "Generally, an order is final and appealable when it leaves no issues remaining to be resolved, constitutes the court's final ruling on the merits of the action, and leaves the parties with no further recourse in the trial court." State v. White, 354 Ga.App. 214, 215 (840 S.E.2d 697) (2020) (citation and punctuation omitted). In this case, the State sought forfeiture of $7, 927, as well as the BMW.

  6. Yanes v. Escobar

    362 Ga. App. 896 (Ga. Ct. App. 2022)   Cited 10 times

    "Generally, an order is final and appealable when it leaves no issues remaining to be resolved, constitutes the court's final ruling on the merits of the action, and leaves the parties with no further recourse in the trial court." State v. White , 354 Ga. App. 214, 215, 840 S.E.2d 697 (2020) (punctuation omitted); see also OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1). Here, the case remains pending below, as the superior court has issued no final ruling.