From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. White

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 11, 1990
554 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Opinion

No. 89-45.

January 11, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Brevard County, Tom Waddell, J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellee.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen. and Kellie A. Nielan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellant.


The State appeals the resentence given Robert Lucian White following remand from this court's decision in State v. White, 532 So.2d 1083 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). The State claims the new sentence not only is inconsistent with the plea agreement but also violates this court's mandate. We agree and reverse.

This court held in the prior appeal that if the trial court accepted the negotiated plea it was bound to the defendant and to the State to sentence within the agreement or to permit the State to withdraw from the agreement and to proceed to trial on the original information. At resentencing the trial court again departed from the negotiated sentence without affording the State the option of proceeding to trial.

Again we reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing pursuant to the negotiated agreement or, if the court finds the agreement unacceptable, trial on the original information.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COWART and PETERSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. White

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 11, 1990
554 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)
Case details for

State v. White

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLANT, v. ROBERT LUCIAN WHITE, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 11, 1990

Citations

554 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

State v. McCulloch

Moreover, regardless of the improper departure, the sentence must be reversed. If a trial court rejects a…