From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. White

COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO DEPARTMENT B
Jun 7, 2012
2 CA-CR 2011-0365 (Ariz. Ct. App. Jun. 7, 2012)

Opinion

2 CA-CR 2011-0365

06-07-2012

THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. ERICA LEA WHITE, Appellant.

Lori J. Lefferts, Pima County Public Defender By Robert J. McWhirter Tucson Attorneys for Appellant


NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Not for Publication Rule 111, Rules of the Supreme Court


APPEAL FROM THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PIMA COUNTY


Cause No. CR20072680


Honorable Deborah Bernini, Judge


AFFIRMED

Lori J. Lefferts, Pima County Public Defender

By Robert J. McWhirter

Tucson

Attorneys for Appellant
VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge.

¶1 After a jury trial in absentia, appellant Erica White was convicted of aggravated driving with an alcohol concentration of .08 or more while her license was suspended. The trial court sentenced White to a "slightly mitigated" term of imprisonment of two years and four months. Counsel has filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Clark, 196 Ariz. 530, 2 P.3d 89 (App. 1999), stating he has reviewed the record and has "found no arguably meritorious issue for appeal." Counsel has asked us to search the record for fundamental error. White has not filed a supplemental brief.

Contrary to Clark's requirement, although counsel has detailed the procedural history of the case, he refers only briefly to its factual history. 196 Ariz. 530, ¶ 30, 2 P.3d at 96. Nonetheless, his brief assures us that he has "thoroughly reviewed the record," id. ¶ 32, and we therefore accept it, but we advise counsel to provide a more detailed factual statement in the future.

¶2 Viewed in the light most favorable to sustaining the verdict, the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's finding of guilt. See State v. Tamplin, 195 Ariz. 246, ¶ 2, 986 P.2d 914, 914 (App. 1999). The evidence presented at trial showed a Tucson police officer initiated a traffic stop after observing White speeding and weaving in and out of her lane. Upon speaking to her, he noticed signs of impairment. He then conducted field sobriety tests, which White performed poorly, and administered breath tests, which showed White had a blood alcohol level of .137 and .145. White's driver license was suspended at the time of the stop. We further conclude the sentence imposed is within the statutory limit. See A.R.S. §§ 13-702, 28-1381, 28-1383.

¶3 Pursuant to our obligation under Anders, we have searched the record for fundamental, reversible error and have found none. Therefore, White's conviction and sentence are affirmed.

_________________

GARYE L. VÁSQUEZ, Presiding Judge

CONCURRING:

_________________

PHILIP G. ESPINOSA, Judge

_________________

VIRGINIA C. KELLY, Judge


Summaries of

State v. White

COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO DEPARTMENT B
Jun 7, 2012
2 CA-CR 2011-0365 (Ariz. Ct. App. Jun. 7, 2012)
Case details for

State v. White

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. ERICA LEA WHITE, Appellant.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION TWO DEPARTMENT B

Date published: Jun 7, 2012

Citations

2 CA-CR 2011-0365 (Ariz. Ct. App. Jun. 7, 2012)