From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wetzel

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
May 10, 2021
NO. 2021 KW 0314 (La. Ct. App. May. 10, 2021)

Opinion

NO. 2021 KW 0314

05-10-2021

STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ANDREW D. WETZEL


In Re: Andrew D. Wetzel, applying for supervisory writs, 22nd Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany, No. 472,552. BEFORE: MCDONALD, HOLDRIDGE, AND LANIER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. The record of the St. Tammany Parish Clerk's Office does not support relator's allegation that the district court granted habeas relief regarding his request to lift the parole hold. Furthermore, the decision in Ramos v. Louisiana, ___ U.S. ___, 140 S.Ct. 1390, 1397, 206 L.Ed.2d 583 (2020), does not apply retroactively; and thus, relator's sentence is not illegal. See La. Const. art. I, § 17; La. Code Crim. P. art. 782. See also State v. Copeland, 52, 742 (La. App. 2d Cir. 9/25/19), 280 So.3d 848, 867 (Copeland's offense was committed on September 15, 2016, well before January 2019, so the unanimous jury verdict law does not apply.) Therefore, the district court did not err by denying the Motion to Declare La. Code Crim. P. art. 782(A) Unconstitutional or by denying the Motion to Correct an Illegal Sentence.

JMM

GH

WIL

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT /s/_________

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT


Summaries of

State v. Wetzel

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT
May 10, 2021
NO. 2021 KW 0314 (La. Ct. App. May. 10, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF LOUISIANA v. ANDREW D. WETZEL

Court:STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

Date published: May 10, 2021

Citations

NO. 2021 KW 0314 (La. Ct. App. May. 10, 2021)