From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Werts

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Jan 5, 1973
203 N.W.2d 157 (Neb. 1973)

Opinion

No. 38731.

Filed January 5, 1973.

Post Conviction: Time. A motion for post conviction relief is premature if there is no judgment or final order which might be vacated or set aside.

Appeal from the district court for Butler County: HOWARD W. KANOUFF, Judge. Affirmed.

Robak Geshell, for appellant.

Clarence A. H. Meyer, Attorney General, and Betsy G. Berger, for appellee.

Heard before WHITE, C.J., SPENCER, BOSLAUGH, SMITH, McCOWN, NEWTON, and CLINTON, JJ.


On June 29, 1972, the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for 1 year upon a plea of guilty to grand larceny. On July 10, 1972, he filed a motion for new trial which the record indicates is still pending. On July 25, 1972, the defendant filed a motion for post conviction relief. He appeals from an order denying that motion.

Since the original proceeding is still pending, there is no judgment or final order which might be vacated or set aside. The judgment denying post conviction relief is, therefore, affirmed.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

State v. Werts

Supreme Court of Nebraska
Jan 5, 1973
203 N.W.2d 157 (Neb. 1973)
Case details for

State v. Werts

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF NEBRASKA, APPELLEE, v. RANDY WERTS, APPELLANT

Court:Supreme Court of Nebraska

Date published: Jan 5, 1973

Citations

203 N.W.2d 157 (Neb. 1973)
203 N.W.2d 157