We note that our approach is consistent with prior non-precedential opinions in which this court has applied Dorsey to the sentencing phase and has concluded that the error was a structural error that required automatic reversal. See State v. Leckner, No. A19-1007, 2020 WL 3172651, at *3-4 (Minn.App. June 15, 2020); State v. Weidenbach, No. A16-1166, 2017 WL 1548619, at *2 (Minn.App. May 1, 2017). Second, the state contends that the structural-error doctrine does not apply because the supreme court applied the plain-error test to an unobjected-to claim of judicial bias in Schlienz.