Opinion
Submitted May 28, 1943 —
Decided September 16, 1943.
On error to Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is reported in 129 N.J.L. 425.
For the defendant in error, Daniel O'Regan.
For the plaintiff in error, Raymond Chasan.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, HEHER, PERSKIE, COLIE, DEAR, WELLS, RAFFERTY, HAGUE, THOMPSON, DILL, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.