From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Washington

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 19, 1994
873 S.W.2d 681 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)

Opinion

Nos. 62904, 64321.

April 19, 1994.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, ST. LOUIS COUNTY; ROBERT W. SAITZ AND DANIEL J. O'TOOLE, JUDGES.

Ellen H. Flottman, Office of the State Public Defender, Columbia, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Mary Moulton Bryan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before CRANDALL, P.J., and REINHARD and CRIST, JJ.


ORDER


Defendant appeals after a jury convicted him of sodomy and the motion court denied his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm. We find no error of law appears and the findings of fact of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5). Further, we find no precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an extended opinion and affirm by written order. Rule 30.25(b); Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.


Summaries of

State v. Washington

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Apr 19, 1994
873 S.W.2d 681 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)
Case details for

State v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF MISSOURI, RESPONDENT, v. DAVID WASHINGTON, APPELLANT. DAVID…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Apr 19, 1994

Citations

873 S.W.2d 681 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994)