State v. Washington

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Donnel Lamont Washington, Appellant.

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 6, 2021

No. 2021-UP-346 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 6, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-346 Appellate Case 2019-001043

10-06-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Donnel Lamont Washington, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, and Donnel Lamont Washington, pro se, both for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted September 1, 2021

Appeal From Georgetown County Larry B. Hyman, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Appellate Defender Kathrine Haggard Hudgins, of Columbia, and Donnel Lamont Washington, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.