From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Ward

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Washington County
Mar 28, 2007
2007 Ohio 1607 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06CA35.

RELEASED March 28, 2007.

David H. Bodiker, State Public Defender, and Brooke M. Burns, Assistant State Public Defender, Columbus, Ohio, for Appellant.

James Schneider, Washington County Prosecuting Attorney, and Alison L. Cauthorn, Washington County Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, Marietta, Ohio, for Appellee.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


{¶ 1} Roger L. Ward, Jr., pled guilty to one count of burglary, a third degree felony. After his original sentence was reversed, he appeals the trial court's imposition of a five-year prison sentence upon remand. Ward contends that the Ohio Supreme Court's decision in State v. Foster (2006), 109 Ohio St.3d 1, 845 N.E.2d 470, violates the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution because it permits the trial court to impose an enlarged sentence beyond that it could have imposed at the time he committed the crime. We have already decided that issue in State v. Grimes (Nov. 24, 2006), Washington App. No. 04CA17, 2006-Ohio-6360 and see no reason to vary from it here. Thus, we conclude that the Supreme Court's decision in Foster does not violate the ex post facto clause because the range of prison terms for a third degree felony are the same both before and after Foster. See Grimes for a more detailed analysis.

JUDGMENT AFFIRMED.

McFarland, P.J. Abele, J.: Concur in Judgment and Opinion.


Summaries of

State v. Ward

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Washington County
Mar 28, 2007
2007 Ohio 1607 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

State v. Ward

Case Details

Full title:State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roger L. Ward, Jr.…

Court:Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fourth District, Washington County

Date published: Mar 28, 2007

Citations

2007 Ohio 1607 (Ohio Ct. App. 2007)