From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Walton-Merritt

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 9, 2022
648 S.W.3d 926 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84698

08-09-2022

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arieous Kahlil WALTON-MERRITT, Appellant.

Julia E. Rives, for Respondent. Joellen Grohs, for Appellant.


Julia E. Rives, for Respondent.

Joellen Grohs, for Appellant.

Division Three: Cynthia L. Martin, Presiding Judge, Lisa White Hardwick, Judge and W. Douglas Thomson, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Arieous Walton-Merritt appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for involuntary manslaughter and armed criminal action. Walton-Merritt presents two points on appeal. In his first point, Walton-Merritt contends that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for new trial and in entering convictions because the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury's findings of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. In his second point, Walton-Merritt argues that the trial court abused its discretion in overruling his motion to strike Venireperson 14 for cause. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Walton-Merritt

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Aug 9, 2022
648 S.W.3d 926 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

State v. Walton-Merritt

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Arieous Kahlil WALTON-MERRITT, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Aug 9, 2022

Citations

648 S.W.3d 926 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)