From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Walls

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 31, 2012
Appellate Case No. 2010-180826 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2012)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2010-180826 Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-584

10-31-2012

The State, Respondent, v. Donnie Ray Walls, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Dayne C. Phillips, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Deputy Attorney General David Spencer, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.


Appeal From Greenville County

C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge


AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Dayne C. Phillips, of Columbia, for

Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney

General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy

Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, Assistant Deputy

Attorney General David Spencer, all of Columbia; and

Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of Greenville, for

Respondent.
PER CURIAM : Donnie Walls appeals his conviction of driving under the influence, arguing the trial judge abused his discretion by refusing to grant a mistrial. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: See State v. Brown, 389 S.C. 84, 95, 697 S.E.2d 622, 628 (Ct. App. 2010) ("If a trial court issues a curative instruction, a party must make a contemporaneous objection to the sufficiency of the curative instruction to preserve an alleged error for review.") State v. George, 323 S.C. 496, 510, 476 S.E.2d 903, 912 (1996) ("No issue is preserved for appellate review if the objecting party accepts the judge's ruling and does not contemporaneously make an additional objection to the sufficiency of the curative charge or move for a mistrial.").

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., and WILLIAMS and PIEPER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Walls

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 31, 2012
Appellate Case No. 2010-180826 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2012)
Case details for

State v. Walls

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Donnie Ray Walls, Appellant.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 31, 2012

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2010-180826 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 31, 2012)