From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Wallen

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Apr 28, 2021
2021-UP-139 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2021-UP-139

04-28-2021

The State, Respondent, v. Ansel Bradley Wallen, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2019-000760

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Submitted April 1, 2021

Appeal From Newberry County R. Scott Sprouse, Circuit Court Judge.

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

KONDUROS, GEATHERS, and MCDONALD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Wallen

Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Apr 28, 2021
2021-UP-139 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2021)
Case details for

State v. Wallen

Case Details

Full title:The State, Respondent, v. Ansel Bradley Wallen, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court:Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Apr 28, 2021

Citations

2021-UP-139 (S.C. Ct. App. Apr. 28, 2021)