Opinion
No. 63691-0-1.
May 3, 2010.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 09-1-02005-8, Richard D. Eadie, J., entered June 19, 2009.
Reversed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hoai Vu appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. He contends, and the State concedes, that the cocaine supporting his conviction should have been suppressed as the product of an unlawful search. The parties agree that the officers had no objectively reasonable safety concerns at the time of the search, and that the warrantless search of Vu's vehicle was therefore not justified. See generally State v. Gossbrener, 146 Wn.2d 670, 49 P.3d 128 (2002). We accept the concession. Because suppression of the cocaine requires dismissal of the charge, we need not reach Vu's other argument on appeal.
Reversed and dismissed.