From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Hoai Phuong Vu

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
May 3, 2010
155 Wn. App. 1046 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010)

Opinion

No. 63691-0-1.

May 3, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 09-1-02005-8, Richard D. Eadie, J., entered June 19, 2009.


Reversed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


Hoai Vu appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. He contends, and the State concedes, that the cocaine supporting his conviction should have been suppressed as the product of an unlawful search. The parties agree that the officers had no objectively reasonable safety concerns at the time of the search, and that the warrantless search of Vu's vehicle was therefore not justified. See generally State v. Gossbrener, 146 Wn.2d 670, 49 P.3d 128 (2002). We accept the concession. Because suppression of the cocaine requires dismissal of the charge, we need not reach Vu's other argument on appeal.

Reversed and dismissed.


Summaries of

State v. Hoai Phuong Vu

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One
May 3, 2010
155 Wn. App. 1046 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010)
Case details for

State v. Hoai Phuong Vu

Case Details

Full title:THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. HOAI PHUONG VU, Appellant

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One

Date published: May 3, 2010

Citations

155 Wn. App. 1046 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010)
155 Wash. App. 1046