In State v. Vines (Sept. 14, 1989), Cuyahoga App. No. 55693, unreported, 1989 WL 107157, we considered an identical argument and stated, "The victim's inability to denote the exact number of times Vines performed these actions goes to the weight of the evidence not the sufficiency.
Summary of this case from State v. WhiteMay 2, 1989.
Petition for certification denied.
In State v. Vines (Sept. 14, 1989), Cuyahoga App. No. 55693, unreported, 1989 WL 107157, we considered an identical argument and stated, "The victim's inability to denote the exact number of times Vines performed these actions goes to the weight of the evidence not the sufficiency.
Summary of this case from State v. WhiteIn State v. Vines (Sept. 14, 1989), Cuyahoga App. No. 55693, unreported, we considered an identical argument where Vines had complained that and stated, "[t] he victim's inability to denote the exact number of times Vines performed these actions goes to the weight of the evidence not the sufficiency.
Summary of this case from State v. WhiteFull title:STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. CATHY VINES
Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey
Date published: May 2, 1989
Defendant also claims that the victim's testimony that defendant completed "three or four" acts of digital…
State v. WhiteDefendant also claims the victim's testimony that defendant completed "three or four" acts of digital…