From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Villegas

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. Panel Two
Mar 13, 2003
116 Wn. App. 1014 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003)

Summary

stating "the crux of our analysis is not [the defendant's] interest [in the container] as applied under property law, but his reasonable expectation of privacy in the [container] under a potential illegal search analysis."

Summary of this case from State v. Rynhart

Opinion

No. 21100-2-III.

March 13, 2003.

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grant County, No. 02-1-00118-4, Evan E. Sperline, J., entered April 19, 2002.


Reversed by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Brown, C.J., and Kato, J.


Summaries of

State v. Villegas

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. Panel Two
Mar 13, 2003
116 Wn. App. 1014 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003)

stating "the crux of our analysis is not [the defendant's] interest [in the container] as applied under property law, but his reasonable expectation of privacy in the [container] under a potential illegal search analysis."

Summary of this case from State v. Rynhart
Case details for

State v. Villegas

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF WASHINGTON, Appellant, v. MICHAEL ANGEL VILLEGAS, Respondent

Court:The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three. Panel Two

Date published: Mar 13, 2003

Citations

116 Wn. App. 1014 (Wash. Ct. App. 2003)
116 Wash. App. 1014

Citing Cases

State v. Rynhart

Accord State v. Finney, No. 21180, 2003 Ohio App. LEXIS 518, *14 (Ohio Ct.App. February 5, 2003) ("'The issue…