From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

STATE v. VIAR

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 27, 1989
95 Or. App. 744 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

87CR-1771; CA A48131

Argued and submitted November 21, 1988

Reversed and remanded for new trial March 22, 1989 reconsideration denied May 12, petition for review allowed June 27, 1989 ( 308 Or. 158) See later issue Oregon Reports

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Coos County, Richard K. Mickelson, Judge pro tempore.

Nick Nylander, North Bend, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Flaxel, Todd Nylander, North Bend.

Jonathan H. Fussner, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Buttler, Presiding Judge, and Warren and Rossman, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for new trial. State v. Ainsworth, 95 Or. App. 240, 770 P.2d 58 (1989).

Rossman, J., dissenting.


For the reasons I expressed in my dissent in State v. Ainsworth, 95 Or. App. 240, 247, 770 P.2d 58 (1989), I dissent.


Summaries of

STATE v. VIAR

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jun 27, 1989
95 Or. App. 744 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

STATE v. VIAR

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. HARRY EMIL VIAR, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jun 27, 1989

Citations

95 Or. App. 744 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
770 P.2d 614

Citing Cases

State v. Gohring

The Court of Appeals, in separate per curiam opinions, reversed the judgment of conviction in each case and…