Opinion
No. 421A13.
2013-11-7
STATE of North Carolina v. Dorothy Hoogland VERKERK.
Matthew C. Suczynski, Chapel Hill, for Verkerk, Dorothy Hoogland. Lauren Tally Earnhardt, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
Matthew C. Suczynski, Chapel Hill, for Verkerk, Dorothy Hoogland. Lauren Tally Earnhardt, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
Derrick Mertz, Assistant Attorney General, for State of North Carolina.
James R. Woodall, Jr., District Attorney, for State of North Carolina.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 30th of September 2013 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A–30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
“Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of November 2013.”
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant on the 30th of September 2013 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
“Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of November 2013.”
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 30th of September 2013 by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A–31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
“Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 7th of November 2013.”