State v. Vanover

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Glenn Edwin Vanover, Appellant. Appellate Case…

Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Date published: Dec 23, 2013

2013-UP-481 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 23, 2013)

Opinion

2013-UP-481

12-23-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Glenn Edwin Vanover, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2012-212998

Katherine Carruth Goode, of Winnsboro, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Julie Kate Keeney, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

Submitted December 1, 2013

Appeal From Lexington County Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Katherine Carruth Goode, of Winnsboro, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant Attorney General Julie Kate Keeney, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: State v. Dunbar, 356 S.C. 138, 142, 587 S.E.2d 691, 693 (2003) ("[F]or an issue to be preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court]." (emphasis added)); id. at 142, 587 S.E.2d at 693-94 ("Issues not raised and ruled upon in the trial court will not be considered on appeal." (emphasis added)); Jackson v. Speed, 326 S.C. 289, 306, 486 S.E.2d 750, 759 (1997) ("[I]t is the responsibility of trial counsel to preserve issues for appellate review.").

AFFIRMED. ¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.