From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Valencia

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 6, 1989
99 Or. App. 589 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

88C 21678; CA A51197

Submitted on record and briefs November 16, 1989

Reversed and remanded for new trial December 6, 1989

Appeal from Circuit Court, Marion County.

Robert B. McConville, Judge.

Jay R. Jackson, Salem, filed the brief for appellant.

Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Robert M. Atkinson, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Joseph, Chief Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.


PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for new trial.


Defendant appeals his conviction on stipulated facts for assault in the second degree. He was tried to the court without a jury. There is nothing in the record to show that a written waiver of the right to jury trial was executed by appellant. Or Const, Art I, § 11; State v. Milstead, 57 Or. App. 658, 646 P.2d 63, rev den 293 Or. 483 (1982). The state concedes that the court improperly allowed a trial without a jury.

Reversed and remanded for a new trial.


Summaries of

State v. Valencia

Oregon Court of Appeals
Dec 6, 1989
99 Or. App. 589 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

State v. Valencia

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Respondent, v. FELIPE SOLIS VALENCIA, Appellant

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 6, 1989

Citations

99 Or. App. 589 (Or. Ct. App. 1989)
783 P.2d 51

Citing Cases

State v. Rice

ORS 475.992. The state concedes that the record does not show that defendant executed a written waiver of his…