From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Urf

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 11, 1988
524 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

Nos. 87-1721, 88-797.

May 11, 1988.

Petition for review from the Circuit Court, Hillsborough County, Harry Lee Coe, III, J.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Davis G. Anderson, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for petitioner.

Herbert P. Sterling, Tampa, for respondent.


The state seeks certiorari review of an order of the circuit court granting Christine Urf's motion to seal records. We find no departure from the essential requirements of law in the court's agreement to seal its own records. See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 336 So.2d 93 (Fla. 1976). However, we do agree that the court exceeded its authority in ordering the sealing by law enforcement agencies of arrest and criminal history records, because Urf, having been adjudged guilty of the offenses in question, did not qualify for such extraordinary relief. §§ 943.058(2) and 943.058(3), Fla. Stat. (1987). Accordingly the petition for writ of certiorari is granted in part and denied in part, and the circuit court is directed to correct its order of June 3, 1987, consistent with this opinion.

RYDER, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Urf

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
May 11, 1988
524 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

State v. Urf

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. CHRISTINE B. URF, RESPONDENT

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: May 11, 1988

Citations

524 So. 2d 1118 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

State v. Pena

This court has recognized that a court has discretion to seal its own records even though a defendant had…

Russell v. Miami Herald Pub. Co.

This court has recognized that a court has discretion to seal its own records even though a defendant had…