From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Truss-Palmer

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY
Jan 28, 2019
2019 Ohio 258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

CASE NO. CA2018-02-033 CASE NO. CA2018-02-034

01-28-2019

STATE OF OHIO, Appellee, v. DORYN TRUSS-PALMER aka DORYN PALMER-TRUSS, JR. Appellant

Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, John C. Heinkel, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellee Charles M. Conliff, 5145 Pleasant Avenue, Suite 8, P.O. Box 18424, Fairfield, Ohio 45018, for appellant


DECISION

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM BUTLER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS
Case No. CR2017-03-0487 Michael T. Gmoser, Butler County Prosecuting Attorney, John C. Heinkel, Government Services Center, 315 High Street, 11th Floor, Hamilton, Ohio 45011, for appellee Charles M. Conliff, 5145 Pleasant Avenue, Suite 8, P.O. Box 18424, Fairfield, Ohio 45018, for appellant Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by appellant Doryn Truss-Palmer, aka Doryn Palmer-Truss, Jr., the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript of proceedings and original papers from the Butler County Court of Common Pleas, and upon a brief filed by appellant's counsel.

{¶ 2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be predicated; (2) lists seven potential errors "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant.

{¶ 3} Having allowed appellant sufficient time to respond, and no response having been received we have accordingly examined the record and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous.

HENDRICKSON, P.J., RINGLAND and PIPER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

State v. Truss-Palmer

COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY
Jan 28, 2019
2019 Ohio 258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)
Case details for

State v. Truss-Palmer

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OHIO, Appellee, v. DORYN TRUSS-PALMER aka DORYN PALMER-TRUSS, JR…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO BUTLER COUNTY

Date published: Jan 28, 2019

Citations

2019 Ohio 258 (Ohio Ct. App. 2019)