State v. Todd

Full title: The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Lee Todd, Appellant.

Court: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Dec 11, 2013

Appellate Case No. 2013-000118 (S.C. Ct. App. Dec. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2013-000118 Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-451

12-11-2013

The State, Respondent, v. Christopher Lee Todd, Appellant.

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, and Christopher Lee Todd, pro se, for Appellant. Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

Appeal From Anderson County

R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, and Christopher Lee Todd, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.¹

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.