From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Tinsley

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 27, 2020
610 S.W.3d 415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)

Opinion

WD 83265

10-27-2020

STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dimitri Devante TINSLEY, Appellant.

Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia for appellant. Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson city for respondent.


Ellen H. Flottman, Columbia for appellant.

Shaun Mackelprang, Jefferson city for respondent.

Before Division Two: Lisa White Hardwick, Presiding Judge, Thomas H. Newton and Karen King Mitchell, Judges

ORDER

Per Curiam

Dimitri Tinsley appeals from his jury convictions of second-degree involuntary manslaughter, armed criminal action, two counts of first-degree endangering the welfare of a child, possession of an unregistered firearm while having been previously convicted of a felony, and possession of a controlled substance. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find no error and affirm the convictions. We have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision, because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).


Summaries of

State v. Tinsley

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Oct 27, 2020
610 S.W.3d 415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)
Case details for

State v. Tinsley

Case Details

Full title:STATE of Missouri, Respondent, v. Dimitri Devante TINSLEY, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Oct 27, 2020

Citations

610 S.W.3d 415 (Mo. Ct. App. 2020)