From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thurston

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Nov 1, 1926
137 S.C. 379 (S.C. 1926)

Opinion

12092

November 1, 1926.

Before JOHNSON, J., Greenville, January, 1926. Affirmed.

Harry Thurston was convicted of violating the prohibition law, and he appeals.

Messrs. Bowen Bryson, for appellant.

Mr. J.C. Leatherwood, Solicitor, for respondent.


November 1, 1926. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


"The defendant-appellant was tried in his absence before Judge J. Henry Johnson and a jury on January 15, 1926, on a charge of violation of the prohibition law, and was convicted and sentenced to serve one year in the state penitentiary, or for a like period on the public works of Greenville County."

The exception is:

"Because his Honor was in error in sentencing the defendant-appellant to one year on the public works of Greenville County, or for a like period in the state penitentiary, without the alternative of a fine, said sentence being an abuse of discretion, in that said sentence was unreasonable and excessive for such a small amount of whisky. Upon the foregoing exception the defendant-appellant asks the Supreme Court to grant a new trial, or to remand said case to the Circuit Court for a modification of said sentence."

The exception is overruled as being without merit.

Judgment affirmed.

MESSRS. JUSTICES COTHRAN, BLEASE, and STABLER and MR. ACTING ASSOCIATE JUSTICE RAMAGE concur.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE GARY did not participate.


Summaries of

State v. Thurston

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Nov 1, 1926
137 S.C. 379 (S.C. 1926)
Case details for

State v. Thurston

Case Details

Full title:STATE v. THURSTON

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Nov 1, 1926

Citations

137 S.C. 379 (S.C. 1926)
135 S.E. 361

Citing Cases

State v. Douglas

None of these hides were the property of Thelan or Douglas or Kaiser, and it cannot be urged that the…