From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

State v. Thornton

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 6, 1983
661 P.2d 555 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)

Opinion

CT 82-1392 and CT 82-1396; CA A26186

Argued and submitted March 6, 1983

Reversed and remanded April 6, 1983

Appeal from District Court, Coos County, Robert E. Jones, Judge.

Robert E. Barton, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and William F. Gary, Solicitor General, Salem.

Ronald K. Cox, Assistant Public Defender, Coquille, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before Gillette, Presiding Judge, and Warden and Young, Judges.


PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for trial.


The trial judge's ruling in this criminal case that a police officer's request to see defendant's driver's license, after the officer had pulled in behind defendant's apparently-disabled vehicle, was an impermissible "stop" of defendant is incorrect, as is the court's order suppressing evidence based upon that conclusion. See State v. Kennedy, 290 Or. 493, 497, 624 P.2d 99 (1981).

The trial court order suppressing evidence is reversed, and the case is remanded for trial.


Summaries of

State v. Thornton

Oregon Court of Appeals
Apr 6, 1983
661 P.2d 555 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
Case details for

State v. Thornton

Case Details

Full title:STATE OF OREGON, Appellant, v. JAMES B. THORNTON, Respondent

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Apr 6, 1983

Citations

661 P.2d 555 (Or. Ct. App. 1983)
661 P.2d 555

Citing Cases

State v. Godwin

This view is consistent with a uniform body of court decisions in other states that a police officer who has…